Did you write all this before or after you read my first letter to you? I couldn’t help but notice it’s conspicuously missing from the series of updates you posted about my blog on FetLife.
I guess you didn’t think being phoned up by the cops and being told to cut the exact same shit was enough last year.
By the way, Jennifer, the word you’re looking for is DISSOCIATIVE. I know you don’t even comprehend what that means because you can neither spell nor pronounce it, but that doesn’t mean the men in white coats are coming for me. I do not suffer “delusions” (in fact, I think you’d be pretty fucking surprised how deluded you are lately if you even stopped momentarily to think about it). And there is no such thing as “distorted personality disorder”, Dr. Armchair.
I normally don’t give advice, but don’t quit your day-job. This pseudo-shrink gig is already not working out for you. Leave it to the better qualified to handle assessments of who’s deluded and/or in danger, kthx. I mean, unless you’re afraid they’d see something if they looked too closely at you. LOLWHOOPS!
Cut the shit before it cuts you. Cease and desist, Jennifer, like you were supposed to last Summer.
For everyone else, here’s a couple of posts that directly concern or address this troll (I mean woman):
- I begin receiving numerous emails from people I have not conversed with in at least six months, about how the person accused of “mass outing” — now a perpetual scapegoating target — is trying to throw me under the bus by painting me as a histrionic and a liar. I wrote her a letter about why I think what’s happening to her is wrong, despite the fact that she has herself given me every reason I need to resent her very existence.
- The woman who is accused of “mass outing”, who has been keeping herself busy smearing other people to deflect attention to what she’s done is slapped with a libel lawsuit — I write her a second letter to tell her how schadenfreude has become one of my preferred outlets for humour lately.
- A blog article is published by one of the former business partners of the woman who has made so much effort to be the public face of Cpl. Jim Brown’s defence, detailing both the libel lawsuit and another civil claim raised by the owner of her former business space. Read about it here.
I mean, let’s be serious.
Who is really in danger, here?
A blogger who has the support and backing of RCMP who are investigating a suspected criminal within their force (as well as a pedophile outside the force — there’s two people here, not two sides to the same person); or the woman who insists, despite being told to cease and desist last year, on smearing said blogger on the basis of their mental health, all while putting her face and voice all over national news in defence of said criminal-suspect-within-the-RCMP (who apparently even breaks bread at her family dinners)?
I know the blogger (me) isn’t the one being sued into potential poverty for defamatory libel and for violating the lease agreement for a company that was never incorporated despite claiming that it was. I know the blogger (me) doesn’t have a family’s futures and a husband who is a shareholder in a business I own to think about.
Who is really delusional and in danger in this conflict?
Who is really the vulnerable one, here, taking other people down with them?
Update (August 29th): While I have learned of a tragedy (for which the English language lacks a single word to gesture at) that impacts Jennifer and her family, in light of which, my instinct would be to hold myself down, it is still neither an excuse nor a defence for the behaviour this blog entry is concerned with. It is not a Criminally Harass Jamie For Free® card. While no one should have to know this grief, relief is not going to come from attacking other people — especially someone such as myself, who had not addressed her at all for nearly a year.